<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social networks cloning is good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloodcarter.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/social-networks-cloning-is-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloodcarter.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/social-networks-cloning-is-good/</link>
	<description>A blog for people who love to think</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:20:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bloodcarter</title>
		<link>http://bloodcarter.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/social-networks-cloning-is-good/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>bloodcarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloodcarter.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Yura,

Thank you for your comment!

Sure. As I already mentioned, copying digital propetries is bad from the legal point of view. But it *can* be good from social, humanistic point of view. Because people are enjoyng best social networking experience and they don&#039;t have to wait will somebody in their local country or area will reinvent the wheel but with some other design, for instance.

This is not true innovation, of course. It&#039;s all about brining some concept to mass and flattening the learning curve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yura,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment!</p>
<p>Sure. As I already mentioned, copying digital propetries is bad from the legal point of view. But it *can* be good from social, humanistic point of view. Because people are enjoyng best social networking experience and they don&#8217;t have to wait will somebody in their local country or area will reinvent the wheel but with some other design, for instance.</p>
<p>This is not true innovation, of course. It&#8217;s all about brining some concept to mass and flattening the learning curve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yura</title>
		<link>http://bloodcarter.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/social-networks-cloning-is-good/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Yura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloodcarter.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-421</guid>
		<description>As a matter of fact, if you copy digital property, such as a design or an article without permission and not in a case of fair use, that is still a crime, at least in the US. I am not uptodate to the laws in Russia, though, but I think they are going to be improved this way.

Copying working community models, great. Copying designs and code, not so great.

While scraping is a form of flattery, building something your own, 10 times better, is preferred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a matter of fact, if you copy digital property, such as a design or an article without permission and not in a case of fair use, that is still a crime, at least in the US. I am not uptodate to the laws in Russia, though, but I think they are going to be improved this way.</p>
<p>Copying working community models, great. Copying designs and code, not so great.</p>
<p>While scraping is a form of flattery, building something your own, 10 times better, is preferred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
